The rise of the internet and its impact on the openness of the justice system in mainland China: improvements and limitations
Abstract
The justice system of mainland China is characterised by secrecy to some extent, although it has been gradually reduced. The widespread availability and usage of the internet has brought a dramatic information flow in mainland China, which could be an opportunity for better access to law and the justice system and increased openness. However, the picture is rather mixed, which will be discussed this paper. Any information which might diminish public confidence on the justice system is still likely to be censored by various means, and public access to information on sensitive cases is still strictly controlled, although the difficulty of doing so is increased by the internet. Therefore, this paper concludes that the rise of the internet cannot definitely lead to more openness of and better access to the justice system without a reform of the system itself.References
Bian, M. (2009), Investigation of Hide and Seek, Bian Min’s Personal Voice (4) (躲猫猫调查，边民个人声音（4）), available at: http://ynbianmin.blog.163.com/blog/static/1062349372009122111545536/ (accessed 4th December, 2013).
Chen, J. and Dong, G. (2008), Analysis of Judicial Unwritten Rules (司法潜规则透析), Research on the Rule of Law, No.2, pp. 37-40.
Chen, R. (1998), The Mistaken Ideas of Justice – A Review of the Judicial Committee (正义的误区——评法院审判委员会制度), Peking University Law Review, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 381-412.
China Internet Network Information Centre (2012), The Statistical Report of China’s Internet Development (中国互联网络发展状况统计报告), available at: http://www.cnnic.cn/research/bgxz/tjbg/201201/P020120118512855484817.pdf (accessed 4th December, 2013).
Deng J. (2006), On Covert Rules: From the Perspective of Criminal Justice (论司法潜规则), Master Dissertation, Soochow University.
He, F. (2011), A Brief Discussion of the Reform of the Courts Funding System (浅谈法院经费保障体制改革), available at: http://hnyyzy.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2011/10/id/926850.shtml (accessed 5 December, 2013).
He, X. (2009), ‘Judicial Finance and Judicial Reform – Comparison of Two Primary Courts’ (司法财政与司法改革——两个基层法院的比较), China Law, No. 4, pp. 40-47.
Institute for Advanced Judicial Studies (2011), Annual Report on China’s Judicial Reform (2010) (the original and full version), available at: http://www.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/PaperCollection/webmanager/wkfiles/8153_1_paper.pdf (accessed 5th December, 2013).
Institute for Advanced Judicial Studies (2012), Annual Report on China’s Judicial Reform (2011), Tribune of Political Science and Law, No. 2, pp. 97-115.
Intermediate People’s Court of Hanjiang of Hubei Province (2006), Regulations of Keeping Secret of Judicial Work of the Intermediate People’s Court of Han Jiang of Hubei Province (湖北省汉江中级人民法院关于保守审判工作秘密的规定), available at: http://hjzy.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=65 (accessed 5th December 2013).
Intermediate People’s Court of Jiyuan (2003), Regulations of Keeping Judicial Secrets (保守审判秘密细则), available at: http://jyzy.hncourt.org/public/detail.php?id=107 (accessed 5th December 2013).
Niu, G. (2003), The Subsidiary Files of the People’s Courts are Strictly Forbidden to be Borrowed and Consulted (人民法院审判卷副卷严禁借阅), Archives Management, No. 4, pp. 25.
Pan, S. (2003), A Study of the Strange Latent Judicial Rules -- A Case Study Based on a Conference Minutes (司法潜规则研究——以会议纪要为例), Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), Vol. 4 No.5, pp. 11-15.
Peng, J. (2005), The Situation and Impact of the Funding of the Primary Courts in the Poor Areas (贫困地区基层法院经费保障状况、影响及思考), available at: http://hunanfy.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=1845 (accessed 4th December, 2013).
Research Office of the Higher People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2006), An Empirical Survey on and Thinking about the Operation of Open Justice (审判公开制度施行情况的实证调查与思考), Journal of Law Application, No. 3, pp. 9-13.
Research Team of the First Intermediate Court of Beijing (2011), An Survey Report of Increasing the Public Credibility of the People’s Courts (关于加强人民法院司法公信力建设的调研报告) The People’s Judicature, No. 5: pp. 43-50.
Research Team of the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province (2012), A Survey Report on Improving Openness and Public Credibility of the Judicial System (关于加大司法公开力度提高司法公信力的调研报告), available at: http://www.gdcourts.gov.cn/gdcourt/front/front!content.action?lmdm=LM52&gjid=20120320020520964138 (accessed 4th December, 2013).
Southern Weekend (2009), The Police Report the “Hide and Seek” Case to the Internet-users’ Investigation Team (警方向网友调查团通报“躲猫猫”事件), available at: http://www.infzm.com/content/24156 (accessed 4th December, 2013).
Wang, B. (2009), Funding Support to the Courts in Impoverished Areas should be Improved – a Survey of Funding of the Courts in Impoverished Areas (应加强对贫困地区法院经费保障的力度——对贫困地区人民法院经费保障情况的调查), available at: http://www.gy.yn.gov.cn/Article/spyf/lldy/ztyj/200910/15926.html (accessed 4th December, 2013)
Wang, P. (2009), The Internet-users Investigation Team Took the Curtain-call but was Questioned (网民调查团质疑声中谢幕), Beijing Times, 22 February 2009, pp. 7.
Wang, P. and Shen, J. (2009), The Report of “Hide and Seek” by Internet-users is Announced It Only Reports the Process without Giving a Conclusion The National News Office Declares that They Support Yun Nan’s Way of Handling Public Opinion (“躲猫猫”网民调查报告公布 只说过程不下结论 国新办曾表态支持云南做法), Beijing Times, 22 February, pp. 6.
Wang, Q. (2011), Open Justice should be Modest and Ordered (司法公开要“公而有度，开而有序”), The People’s Judicature, No. 21, pp. 55.
Xia, M. (2010), The Public Credibility of the Judicial System Relies on the Abolishment of the Unwritten Rules – From the Perspective of Open Justice of the People’s Courts (司法公信力在于祛除司法潜规则——以人民法院的司法公开为视角), Forum of The Rule of Law, No. 1, pp. 100-110.
Xinhua (2009), The Supreme People’s Procuratorate Appointed Staff Intervene into the Investigation of the Hide and Seek Case (最高人民检察院派员指导 介入躲猫猫调查), available at: http://www.sd.xinhuanet.com/news/2009-02/26/content_15797838.htm (accessed 5th December, 2013).
Ye, Q., Zhang, D. and Liu, G. (2011), A Survey Report on the Publicity of Criminal Trials (刑事审判公开问题实证调研报告), Legal Science Monthly, No. 7, pp. 148-158.
Zhou, D. (2008), Research on the Unwritten Rules of the Judicial Committee – Observation of the Resolution of a Civil Dispute (审判委员会制度的潜规则研究———以一起民事纠纷的解决为考察起点), Politics and Law, No. 6, pp. 20-25
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Agreement with AuthorsAuthors submitting a paper to JOAL automatically agree to confer a limited license to JOAL if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. This license allows JOAL to publish a manuscript in a given issue, by any means, anywhere in the world. Authors whose submissions have been accepted then have a choice of:
- Dedicating the article to the public domain. This allows anyone to make any use of the article at any time, including commercial use. A good way to do this is to use the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication Web form; see http://creativecommons.org/license/publicdomain-2?lang=en.
- Retaining some rights while allowing some use. For example, authors may decide to disallow commercial use without permission. Authors may also decide whether to allow users to make modifications (e.g.translations, adaptations) without permission. A good way to make these choices is to use a Creative Commons license.
- Go to http://creativecommons.org/license/.
- Choose and select license. Choose "generic" if you are in the U.S. and "text" for JOAL articles.
- What to do next — you can then e–mail the license html code to yourself. Do this, and then forward that e–mail to JOAL’s editors. Put your name in the subject line of the e–mail with your name and article title in the e–mail.
- Retaining full rights, including translation and reproduction rights. Authors may use the statement: © Author 2013 All Rights Reserved. Authors may choose to use their own wording to reserve copyright. If you choose to retain full copyright, please add your copyright statement to the end of the article.
